Searchable abstracts of presentations at key conferences on calcified tissues
Bone Abstracts (2026) 8 P31 | DOI: 10.1530/obabs.08.P31

OP2026 Poster Presentations Clinical Audits and Service Improvements (40 abstracts)

Implementing a cross-trust rheumatologyrenal MDT: early outcomes from the first 10 complex cases

Kapil Kumar Garg 1 , Anupama Nandagudi 1,2 , Anurag Bharadwaj 1 , Gowrie Balasubramaniam 1 & Kassim Javaid 3


1Basildon University Hospital, Mid South Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Basildon, United Kingdom;2Visiting Associate Professor, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, United Kingdom;3Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom


Background: Osteoporosis management in chronic kidney diseasemineral bone disorder (CKD-MBD) is challenging due to altered bone turnover, disordered mineral metabolism, and the high risk of denosumab-associated hypocalcaemia when creatinine clearance (CrCl) is 30 ml/min and patchy evidence base. Fragmented pathways between primary and secondary care further increase the risk of adverse events and missed fracture-prevention opportunities. To address this, a cross-speciality rheumatologyrenal, cross-trust (Mid and South Essex, Luton, and Oxford University Hospitals) virtual CKD-MBD multidisciplinary team (MDT) was established within the osteoporosis service in September 2024, supported by a locally developed denosumab safety pathway aligned with KDIGO principles. We report early outcomes from the first 10 complex patients reviewed.

Methods: This prospective service evaluation include first 10 consecutive referrals to 2-monthly MDT. MDT outputs included riskbenefit assessment, treatment recommendations, and clearly assigned monitoring responsibilities, communicated to primary care.

Results: Ten patients (mean age 82.6 years; 8 CrCl 15-30 and 2 15 ml/min). Denosumab initiated or continued in six-patients, two were redirected to zoledronate, and two deferred pending metabolic optimisation. Two patients sustained new fragility fractures. (Table 1)

Table 1. Summary of first 10 CKD-MBD MDT patients
Age/SexCKD / CrCl (ml/min)Post-Denosumab Calcium (mmol/L)New Fracture on follow-upMDT Outcome
85FCKD4/18NormalT12 fractureDenosumab restarted
88MCKD4/26Not-applicableHip fractureDenosumab planned; bone-profile optimisation
88FCKD4/29Not-applicableNo2× Yearly Zoledronate
77FCKD4/221.97↓NoDenosumab, calcium monitoring
59FCKD5/5(Dialysis)Not-applicableNoAlfacalcidol
74MCKD4/171.67↓NoIV calcium; patient refused Denosumab
99FCKD4/29(variable)NormalNoPatient declined denosumab; Oral calciumvitamin-D only
83MCKD4/17↓1.93↓T10 fractureDenosumab paused; bone--profile optimisation
87MCKD5/14↓NormalNoOral calcium
86FCKD4/22↓NormalNoDenosumab; Calcium monitoring

Conclusion: Embedding a regular virtual CKD-MBD MDT within osteoporosis services enabled structured decision-making, safer denosumab use, and standardised monitoring. Denosumab was used in patients with renal impairment where treatment might previously have been deferred. This pathway-driven, cross-specialty model provides a replicable framework for improving safety and treatment optimisation in advanced CKD-associated osteoporosis.

Article tools

My recent searches

No recent searches