OP2026 Poster Presentations Clinical Audits and Service Improvements (40 abstracts)
1Basildon University Hospital, Mid South Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Basildon, United Kingdom;2Visiting Associate Professor, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Social Care, Anglia Ruskin University, Chelmsford, United Kingdom;3Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
Background: Osteoporosis management in chronic kidney diseasemineral bone disorder (CKD-MBD) is challenging due to altered bone turnover, disordered mineral metabolism, and the high risk of denosumab-associated hypocalcaemia when creatinine clearance (CrCl) is 30 ml/min and patchy evidence base. Fragmented pathways between primary and secondary care further increase the risk of adverse events and missed fracture-prevention opportunities. To address this, a cross-speciality rheumatologyrenal, cross-trust (Mid and South Essex, Luton, and Oxford University Hospitals) virtual CKD-MBD multidisciplinary team (MDT) was established within the osteoporosis service in September 2024, supported by a locally developed denosumab safety pathway aligned with KDIGO principles. We report early outcomes from the first 10 complex patients reviewed.
Methods: This prospective service evaluation include first 10 consecutive referrals to 2-monthly MDT. MDT outputs included riskbenefit assessment, treatment recommendations, and clearly assigned monitoring responsibilities, communicated to primary care.
Results: Ten patients (mean age 82.6 years; 8 CrCl 15-30 and 2 15 ml/min). Denosumab initiated or continued in six-patients, two were redirected to zoledronate, and two deferred pending metabolic optimisation. Two patients sustained new fragility fractures. (Table 1)
| Age/Sex | CKD / CrCl (ml/min) | Post-Denosumab Calcium (mmol/L) | New Fracture on follow-up | MDT Outcome |
| 85F | CKD4/18 | Normal | T12 fracture | Denosumab restarted |
| 88M | CKD4/26 | Not-applicable | Hip fracture | Denosumab planned; bone-profile optimisation |
| 88F | CKD4/29 | Not-applicable | No | 2× Yearly Zoledronate |
| 77F | CKD4/22 | 1.97↓ | No | Denosumab, calcium monitoring |
| 59F | CKD5/5(Dialysis) | Not-applicable | No | Alfacalcidol |
| 74M | CKD4/17 | 1.67↓ | No | IV calcium; patient refused Denosumab |
| 99F | CKD4/29(variable) | Normal | No | Patient declined denosumab; Oral calciumvitamin-D only |
| 83M | CKD4/17↓ | 1.93↓ | T10 fracture | Denosumab paused; bone--profile optimisation |
| 87M | CKD5/14↓ | Normal | No | Oral calcium |
| 86F | CKD4/22↓ | Normal | No | Denosumab; Calcium monitoring |
Conclusion: Embedding a regular virtual CKD-MBD MDT within osteoporosis services enabled structured decision-making, safer denosumab use, and standardised monitoring. Denosumab was used in patients with renal impairment where treatment might previously have been deferred. This pathway-driven, cross-specialty model provides a replicable framework for improving safety and treatment optimisation in advanced CKD-associated osteoporosis.