Searchable abstracts of presentations at key conferences on calcified tissues
Bone Abstracts (2014) 3 PP209 | DOI: 10.1530/boneabs.3.PP209

ECTS2014 Poster Presentations Muscle, physical activity and bone (16 abstracts)

Does bone density, bone strength, sarcopenia or dynapenia explain greater risk of fracture in obesity?

Amy Evans , Richard Eastell & Jennifer Walsh

University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Obesity is associated with greater risk of proximal humerus and ankle fracture, despite greater areal BMD (aBMD). We aimed to investigate whether greater risk of some fractures in obesity was due to skeletal or non-skeletal determinants. 100 individually-matched pairs of normal weight (NW) (18.5–24.9 kg/m2) and obese (OB) (BMI >30 kg/m2) individuals, aged 25–40 and 55–75 years underwent DXA to determine hip and lumbar spine aBMD, whole body lean mass (WBLM) and appendicular lean mass (ALM). We used HR-pQCT to determine volumetric BMD (vBMD) at the distal radius and tibia and micro-finite element analysis to estimate bone strength. Falls in the 6 months prior to recruitment were reported by questionnaire. Grip strength was measured with a dynometer. Short physical performance battery (SPPB) score was derived from gait speed, balance (from 6 m narrow walk), and repeated chair-stand time quartile. OB had greater hip and spine aBMD, tibia and radius vBMD (all P<0.001) and estimated failure load (Table 1). 15% of OB reported having fallen, compared to 5% of NW (P=0.07). OB had greater WBLM, ALM and skeletal muscle index (all P<0.001). Despite greater LM, SPPB score was poorer in OB, due to slower gait speed (P<0.001), slower chair-stand time (P<0.001) and poorer balance (P<0.01). There was no difference in grip strength between OB and NW. Obese individuals have higher BMD at all sites, so excess of some fractures in obesity may not be due to lower bone strength. Obesity appears protective against sarcopenia due to greater LM, but physical function is impaired. Poor physical performance in obesity could contribute to greater risk of falls and some fractures.

Table 1 Comparison of estimated failure load, skeletal muscle index and SPBB scores between normal weight and obese individuals.
Radius estimated failure load, kN4.13 (1.2)4.79 (1.2)***
Tibia estimated failure load, kN11.14 (2.6)12.71 (2.6)***
Skeletal muscle index, kg/m27.03 (1.1)9.01 (1.3)***
SPPB score8.29 (2.2)6.51 (2.3)***
Significant at: ***P<0.001 mean (s.d.)

Volume 3

European Calcified Tissue Society Congress 2014

Prague, Czech Republic
17 May 2014 - 20 May 2014

European Calcified Tissue Society 

Browse other volumes

Article tools

My recent searches

No recent searches.